STUDY THEME: FAMILY MEMBERS SHOWING GRACE. 5-18-03
"GIVING UNSELFISHLY TO GOD’S WORK. ACTS 4:32-5:11.
ACTS 4:32-35, 36-37; 5:1-6, 7-11.
PLEASE OPEN YOUR BIBLE TO ACTS 4.
Our first two lessons in this series were based upon passages in the Old Testament. The one this Sunday is taken from the New Testament book of Acts. It studies two different family units. One was a single person family and the other was a married couple family. The lesson does not, however, focus upon their being single or married but rather upon their attitude and practice of giving. Their giving revealed a far deeper spiritual condition. One attitude was that of spiritual health and the other was of spiritual death. The theme of this lesson is that families with a right attitude toward giving, honor God; Luke, the author of Acts will contrast Barnabas with Ananias and Sapphira.
There is much to be learned from both experiences. Much good can come from our learning about Barnabas, and much negative can be learned about what not to do from the experience of the married couple. God’s judgment was awesome in the latter case. God apparently wanted to teach an unforgettable lesson.
The suggested "Bible Truth" for this lesson is that Christian families should give to God’s work voluntarily, without duplicity, and out of reverence for God. The suggested "Life Impact" for the lesson is to help us develop a lifestyle of giving unselfishly to God’s work.
The Jerusalem church gave generously and voluntarily to meet the needs of those in the congregation. Barnabas is a positive example. Ananias and Sapphira are negative examples. They lied to the Holy Spirit and fell down dead when confronted with their sin. The result was a sense of holy fear, among those who learned of this event.
The three Focal Passage Outline points answer the Life Question. With what attitudes should I and my family, give to God’s work? (1) Give voluntarily. (2) Live without duplication. (3) Give out of reverence for God.
More important than the amount of money given, the manner in which people give to the Lord is a key indication of their spiritual condition. Giving tithes and offerings is an act of worship, not just a means of providing for the needs of the church. The attitude of family members about giving reveals much about their hearts and their relationships with God.
Financial decisions are among the most common causes of disharmony in the average family. Sound financial decisions are vital, not only in making household purchases, but also in the manner in which a family gives to the church. My mother and Dad sold a rent house. Dad was determined to tithe the money received. Mother pointed out that they had already tithed the money they had paid for the house earlier. I don’t remember who won that argument.
1. PLEASE READ ACTS 4: 32-35.
The pouring out of the Holy Spirit upon the disciples in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost, in Acts 2: 1-3 was the beginning of the church. Over 3,000 people accepted Christ following Peter’s sermon. Believers in Jesus met together to learn about their new Savior and Lord. In this newly constituted, spiritual family, physical needs existed. Some of the believers did not have the basic necessities of food, clothing and shelter.
Luke did not reveal the reasons for the extreme poverty of some within the church at Jerusalem. Possible explanations, however, are not difficult to discover. Among the new converts there would certainly have been widows and orphans, who were notoriously poor. Those who confessed faith in Christ may have lost other means of assistance from family, synagogues, or the community as an early form of persecution. Also, many early converts were slaves or servants who had little income.
Nevertheless, Luke described an incredible unity within the infant church. All the believers were one in heart and mind. This harmony was the result of their focus on Christ and the filling of the Holy Spirit. Their common love for Christ resulted in a love for one another. This love was expressed through concern for each other’s physical and spiritual needs. They shared their possessions with each other. It is important to notice that this sharing was not mandatory; but voluntary. The right to own and keep personal property was not forbidden to Israel under the Old Covenant or to members of the church under the New Covenant.
Genuine care for another person can never be coerced. Only through love will one individual sacrifice to meet the needs of someone else. The early church abounded in authentic concern as the believers did what they could to aid one another. The era of persecution had not yet descended fully on the church, but many Jewish Christians suffered as the result of their faith. Even in good times, some people lacked the basic necessities of life. The believers benevolent care for others give testimony to the effect Christ had on their lives.
In Vs. 32-35 Luke emphasized that the apostles continued to testify about the resurrection of Lord Jesus. Luke may have meant to show that while the church members tended to the physical needs of people, the apostles remained focused on the preaching of the gospel of Christ. Such an interpretation would be consistent with the purpose behind the choosing of the first deacons in Acts 6: 1-7. The disciples did not feel that they should leave the ministry of the Word in order to handle issues like the disbursement of food to widows. Rather, they commended the care of the widows, (and perhaps other such needs), into the hands of lay leaders.
Another view of this passage could indicate that the way in which the believers cared for one another was a strong testimony to the power of Christ. Each of the descriptive phrases reveals different ways in which God blessed the early Christians’ lives and witnesses.
First, all the believers shared a unity in heart and mind. They were not divided by petty jealousies or by personal agendas. These early Christians had discovered that the primary issue of life was Christ and were so captivated by Him that possessions were not important.
A second illustration of Christ’s impact on the believers was the way they shared everything they had. In fact, they did more than display generosity in sharing food, clothing and other possessions. They did not even claim ownership to any thing that they previously might have held dear. Instead, the Christians considered nothing to be their own. They were like a large family, sharing as each had a need.
Some of the verses in Acts 4:32-35 sound as if the Jerusalem Church, in the early years practiced a kind of community of possessions. A close study of these verses shows this is not an accurate understanding.
The phrase "all things in common" in Acts 2:44 and 4:32 does not convey that the early Christians lived in a commune or pooled and redistributed everything equally. Vs. 32 says "No one claimed that any of his possessions were his own." This does not mean that no one continued to have anything of his own. Rather it means that they did not show the kind of selfish spirit that some people use when they speak of their possessions. They held their own possessions lightly, ready to be used at any moment for someone else, as needs arose. The believers understood that all they had belonged to God and therefore when a brother or sister had a need those who could meet it felt obligated to do so.
James 2:15-17 says, "If you know someone who doesn’t have any clothes or food, you shouldn’t just say, ‘I hope all goes well for you. I hope you will be warm and have plenty to eat. What good is it to say this, unless you do something to help?" "Faith that doesn’t lead us to do good deeds is all alone and dead!" 1 John 3: 17-18 says, "If we have all we need and see one of our own people in need, we must have pity on that person, or else we cannot say we love God. Children, you show love for others by truly helping them, and not merely talking about it."
When the world uses the word mine, they use it like a child does when he grabs a favorite toy, clutches it tightly and says, "This is mine, not yours." Christian love demands that believers give of themselves and their possessions for the needs of others---‘What’s mine is yours." Those who have oneness of Spirit in the Lord have a sense of belonging to the Lord and to one another. One expression of this oneness is giving to meet the needs of other.
Because of having Christ in common, those in the Jerusalem church considered all they possessed to be in common. They may have had a common fund into which voluntary gifts were put and from which distributions were made, but the common fund did not contain all the possessions of all the members.
Vs. 33 deals with the out reach of the church. The apostles continued to proclaim the resurrection of the Lord Jesus and they did so with great power. The power, of course, was that of the Spirit of God. Including Vs. 33a in the midst of a description of the giving of the early church shows that oneness of spirit is not inconsistent with an evangelistic spirit. In fact, in the N.T. evangelism and fellowship are inseparable. A church should be a warm fellowship, but it must not become a closed society that is content with itself. The warmer the family spirit, the warmer should be the outreach for others. A S.S. class ought to be a support group, but it must not become exclusive instead of inclusive.
The words "great grace" was upon them all to reinforce that the sharing of goods and proclaiming Christ were acts made possible by the grace of God. They had been saved by God’s grace, and His favor rested on them and inspired them as they lived for Him and served Him. Those words show that God’s favor rested on them. He was pleased with what they were doing. The background to Vs. 34a is Deut. 15:1-11. "Neither was there any among them that lacked" sounds like the ideal situation described in Deut. 15:4: "There shall be no poor among you."
2. PLEASE READ ACTS 4: 36-37.
In these two verses Luke focused on one example of sacrificial giving in the Jerusalem church. Joseph was a Levite from the Island of Cyprus. Joseph was a famous name in the Bible. But this man was known by his nickname. The Apostles called him Barnabas; which means "son of consolation or encouragement." He was an early convert to Christianity.
In most of the biblical stories about Barnabas, he was encouraging others. He encouraged Saul of Tarsus when he stood up for the former persecutor of the church before the leaders of the Jerusalem Church. He encouraged the new approaches of the church at Antioch. He encouraged John Mark by giving him a second chance. Here in Acts 4:36-39 he encouraged the poor in Jerusalem by his generous gift. He is cited as a good example of how one person practiced Vs. 32-35. Barnabas owned some land, which he sold. Then he brought the money, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.
This was a voluntary and generous gift. It shows that Barnabas owned something that he chose to sell and to give the money to the apostles. We are not told whether he owned other land, but, he gave something that he could have kept for future security or profit. Many people think they never get enough for themselves. One secret of generous giving is contentment with less than others think is necessary for the good life and for security.
In laying the proceeds at the apostles’ feet, Barnabas was giving it to God for use in helping the needy. The apostles, in receiving his gift, were accountable for distributing it in the way Barnabas intended.
Some have wondered why a Levite owned property since Numbers 18:20-24 forbids a Levite owning property. The answer is probably that those restrictions were no longer observed in the first century A.D. Or it may have been the regulation in Palestine did not apply in the countries ---such as Cyprus. Barnabas gave all the proceeds to the church.
The amount given was left to Barnabas’s discretion. He was not obligated to give it all, but he chose to do so cheerfully and willingly. Cheerful giving is the only kind of giving that pleases God. 2 Cor. 6-7 says "Whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows generously will also reap generously. Each man should give what he has decided in his heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver."
We too can show our love for God and others through cheerful giving. Giving to support our church, missions, or special needs are just some of the opportunities we have to encourage others.
Why was Barnabas’s gift singled out for such an honorable mention in Luke’s Gospel? Perhaps the uniqueness of a Levite’ gift drew special attention. More likely, since Luke would later describe Barnabas’s special position among the early church leaders, Luke wanted to use the generosity of Barnabas as an example of the love that motivated the giving by these early Christians. Perhaps, too, Luke wanted to contrast the simple honesty of Barnabas’s gift with the deception of two others in that church—a husband and wife named Ananias and Sapphira.
PLEASE TURN NOW TO ACTS 5.
5. PLEASE READ ACTS 5: 1-6. (An’-a-ni’-as)
The opening word of this section of Acts, "But," at once suggests a contrast. Interest still centers in the church at Jerusalem. We are still observing the first things in the history of the church in that city.
In the passage just read w are faced with a new peril, and a new manifestation of power. The passage opens with the tragic and awful story of Ananias and Sapphira; but it closes in Vs. 16 with the account of how all the sick and demon possessed who were brought to the Apostles were healed.
The story of Barnabas’s generosity stands in stark contrast to the evil deeds of a husband and wife in the church at Jerusalem.
The account of Ananias and Sapphira begins, as did the account of Barnabas, by stating that they sold a possession. However, they were the opposite kind of people from Barnabas. Barnabas acted for the glory of God and to meet the needs of others. Although the text does not spell out their motives, the context implies that Ananias and Sapphira acted in order to be praised for their generosity.
Luke did not specifically state that Ananias and Sapphira knew of Barnabas’s gift, but the Greek syntax indicates a close connection with the previous verses. It is certainly possible that the praise given to Barnabas may have motivated Ananias and Sapphira to seek recognition for themselves. Apparently they desired praise, but they did not want to obtain it at the expense of financial sacrifice. Giving that pleases God does not seek recognition and is performed when possible in secret, according to Matt. 6:3-4.
Vs. 2 reveals that both husband and wife conspired together in what they did. With his wife’s full knowledge Ananias kept back part of the money for himself. Ananias and Sapphira were motivated by selfishness, pride, and covetousness. We aren’t told whether keeping back part of the proceeds was their plan from the beginning or whether they decided to do this after they had the money from the sale. In either case, they kept part for themselves. Then Ananias came alone, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the Apostles feet. This action, on the surface, appeared to mimic what Barnabas had done. In other words, what he brought was supposed to be the total selling price. Later, when Sapphira came, Peter asked her if they had brought all the money from the sale.
When Ananias came, Peter knew that he had not brought it all. Peter asked Ananias why he had kept back part of the price of the land. Peter, as the spokesman for the Apostles revealed the sin with penetrating insight from the Holy Spirit. Vs. 4 again shows that the Jerusalem believers’ giving was voluntary giving of their private property. The possession was theirs to sell or to keep. Further, they were free to give whatever part they chose to give. But Ananias was claiming before the church to be giving the entire selling price. To do this was to lie to the Holy Spirit. There was no sin in selling the field or even in keeping part of it, but they sinned by claiming to offer all to the Lord when they brought only a part.
Ananias lied. He claimed to be led by the Spirit, but Satan actually led him. Peter asked Ananias why he had let Satan fill his heart.
This was a serious sin against God. Lying to God is both foolish and sinful. Claiming to be led by the Spirit when actually led by the devil is even worse.
When Ananias heard Peter speak these words of Vs. 3-4, he fell down, and gave up the ghost; he died. What caused Ananias’s death? Some feel he died of shock with a heart attack. Whatever the autopsy report would have said, his death was a judgment from God. In that land and time, people were usually buried on the day of their death. Thus "the young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried him out and buried him."
Proper motives and integrity are essential ingredients in Christian stewardship. We should not give to impress people. We should never misrepresent the reasons for or the amount of our gifts. We should give willingly, with integrity, and in gratitude for what God has done for us in Christ Jesus.
4. PLEASE READ ACTS 5: 7-11.
For some reason that we are not told, his wife came in about three hours later. Peter asked her if they had sold the field for the amount of money they had brought. Peter seems to have been giving her an opportunity to tell the truth. Instead of confessing their sin, she told a bold-faced lie. She apparently had not heard of her husband’s death. Peter shocked her by asking "How is it that you have agreed together to test the Spirit of the Lord." Peter knew that the couple had conspired together. Sapphira must have been wide-eyed in amazement when Peter pronounced her judgment; when he told her,
"The feet of the men who buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out also." She fell dead on the spot, and the young men took her body out and buried it.The punishment for the act of lying may seem too severe for those living in our culture. The root of this sin, however, was not the lies Ananias and Sapphira told. The real problem was a lack of reverence for the holiness of God. The thought that God would not know or that He would not care about their deception. Their miscalculation resulted in their untimely deaths and a record of their failure for all future generations to read.
When Ananias died in the way he did, great fear came on all them that heard these things. When the same thing happened to his wife, great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things. The Bible, especially the O.T., calls on people to fear the Lord. Although love dominates in the N.T., the N.T. also warns of the deadliness of sin and calls sinners to fear the Lord. The author of Hebrews 10:31 wrote,
"It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God." For people of faith and obedience, being in God’s hands is a reassuring experience; however, for those who disobey, it is a fearful thing. Biblical fear includes awe and reverence, but it also includes fear of punishment for sin.Let it be carefully remembered that the sin of Ananias and Sapphire was not that of refusing to contribute. They brought a part of the price. Neither was it that of refusing to give all. It was not wrong that they should bring part of the price. The administration of the early Church was not by law, rule, regulation or requirement. It was the natural and beautiful outcome of the spirit-life by which all were mastered.
Wherein lay the sin? One must discover the nature of the sin by what Peter said both to Ananias and Sapphira. The sin of Ananaias and Sapphira was the sin of pretending that part was all. It was the sin of hypocrisy, of attempting to appear what they really were not, of endeavoring to make it appear that they had done what they really had not. The sin was that of lying; so the apostle named it: "
How is it that thou hast conceived this thing in thy heart? Thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God." This was the terrible nature of the sin; not that of refusing to give; and that of only giving part; but that of attempting to make men believe that they had given all, when they had only given part, and so that of lying to God.The one thing that made Christ angry, the one thing against which He uttered His severest words, was the sin of hypocrisy. What severe things He said to the men who pretended to be religious; what scorching, blasting words fell from His lips against such. He had no attitude toward the hypocrite, but that of unsparing severity; no language for the hypocrite, but the language of denunciation and of fire.
"Ye hypocrites who whiten the external, and within are full of dead men’s bones and of all uncleanness."Someone asked, "Were Ananias and Sapphira true believers?" They may have been believers who were guilty of serious sins. If so, according to 1 Cor. 3:15 "they were saved but as through fire." God sometime punishes sins of believers with illness and even with death. Or they may have been church members but not true believers. Either way, they committed serious sins and were punished quickly. What would happen today if God were to smite with death all church members who committed the sins Ananias and Sapphira committed?
The judgment of Ananias and Sapphira is also a warning against greed and materialism. There can be no other explanation for their keeping part of the money from the sale of their property. Greed and materialism continue to be problems for many Christians today. The love of money has a way of replacing a love for God. The results are a failure to give to God’s work as we should, a failure to help others in need, and a life focused on wealth instead of godliness.
Barnabas’s act provided an example worthy of imitation. His love for God and the needs of the local church led him to an act of sacrificial giving. He encouraged those who were poor with his gift. He encouraged those with wealth to follow his example. Barnabas continued to have a significant ministry in the early church. He helped establish the ministry of the apostle Paul and was involved in significant missionary tours.
The acts of Ananias and Sapphira provided warning to the early Christian community and continue to serve as warnings to Christians today. Although our sins are forgiven in Christ, we must not treat the Lord or His law with disdain. A failure to honor the Lord with our words and deeds will draw discipline. Integrity and generosity are the marks of the faithful Christian steward. 1 Cor. 10:31 "Whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God."
2 Cor. 8:12 "If the willingness is there, the gift is acceptable according to what one has, not according to what he does not have."
NEXT SUNDAY FROM ACTS 18 AND ROMANS 16 THE THEME IS THAT "FAMILIES CAN WORK TOGETHER TO SERVE GOD." A.V. DAUGHERTY 5-18-03